INTRODUCTION
Evidence-based literature comes from many sources. The discipline of nursing has an abundance of research data and resources to guide clinical decisions. Therefore, it is of pivotal importance to understand the basic tenets of critical appraisal of such evidence for its use in interprofessional healthcare practices.
In this task, you will identify a healthcare problem, develop an evidence-based practice (EBP) question, and review selected research and non-research evidence to find answers to that question.
Note that while you will be analyzing only one research-based and one non-research-based article in this task, an actual evidence-based practice change would require the support of many high-quality research studies.
REQUIREMENTS
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The originality report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc., unless specified in the task requirements. All other submissions must be file types that are uploaded and submitted as attachments (e.g., .docx, .pdf, .ppt).
A. Discuss the impact of a clinical practice problem on the patient(s) and the organization it affects.
1. Identify the following PICO components of the clinical practice problem:
• patient/population/problem (P)
• intervention (I)
• comparison (C)
• outcome (O)
2. Develop an evidence-based practice (EBP) question based on the clinical practice problem discussed in part A and the PICO components identified in part A1.
Note: Refer to “Appendix B: Question Development Tool” for information on the creation of an EBP question.
B. Select a research-based article that answers your EBP question from part A2 to conduct an evidence appraisal.
1. Discuss the background or introduction (i.e., the purpose) of the research article.
2. Describe the research methodology.
3. Identify the level of evidence using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice (JHNEBP) model.
Note: The article you select should not be more than five years old.
Note: Refer to “Appendix E: Research Evidence Appraisal Tool” for information on how to level a research-based article.
4. Summarize how the researcher analyzed the data in the article.
5. Summarize the ethical consideration(s) of the research-based article. If none are present, explain why.
6. Identify the quality rating of the research-based article according to the JHNEBP model.
Note: Refer to “Appendix E: Research Evidence Appraisal Tool” for information on how to establish the quality rating.
7. Analyze the results or conclusions of the research-based article and explain how the article helps answer your EBP question.
C. Select a non-research article from a peer-reviewed journal that helps to answer your EBP question from part A2 to conduct an evidence appraisal.
1. Discuss the background or introduction (i.e., the purpose) of the non-research article.
2. Describe the type of evidence (e.g., case study, quality improvement project, clinical practice guideline).
3. Identify the level of evidence using the JHNEBP model.
Note: The article you select should not be more than five years old.
Note: Refer to “Appendix F: Non-Research Evidence Appraisal Tool” for information on how to level the non-research-based article.
4. Identify the quality rating of the non-research-based article according to the JHNEBP model.
5. Discuss how the author’s recommendation(s) in the article helps to answer your EBP question.
D. Recommend a practice change that addresses your EBP question using both the research and non-research articles you selected for Part B and Part C.
1. Explain how you would involve three key stakeholders in supporting the practice change recommendation.
2. Discuss one specific barrier you may encounter when implementing the practice change recommendation.
3. Identify one strategy that could be used to overcome the barrier discussed in part D2.
4. Identify one outcome (the O component in PICO) from your EBP question to measure the recommended practice change.
E. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
F. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
RUBRIC
A:CLINICAL PRACTICE PROBLEM | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not identify a clinical practice problem or does not include a discussion of the impact of a clinical practice problem on the patient(s) and the organization it affects. | The submission includes a discussion of the clinical practice problem but does not logically address its impact on the patient(s) and the organization it affects. | The submission includes a discussion of the clinical practice problem that logically addresses its impact on the patient(s) and the organization it affects. |
A1:PICO COMPONENTS | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not include each of the given PICO components of the clinical practice problem. | The submission includes each of the PICO components of the clinical practice problem, but 1 or more of the given components are inaccurate or incomplete. | The submission includes each of the given PICO components of the clinical practice problem. Each of the given components is accurate and complete. |
A2:EVIDENCE-BASED QUESTION | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not include an EBP question. | The submission includes an EBP question, but the EBP question does not appropriately address the clinical practice problem or does not include all the PICO components. | The submission includes an EBP question that appropriately addresses the clinical practice problem and includes all the PICO components. |
B: SELECTION OF A RESEARCH-BASED ARTICLE | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
An article selection is not provided. | The selected article is not research based or does not answer the EBP question from part A2. | The selected article is research based and answers the EBP question from part A2. |
B1: BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION OF THE RESEARCH-BASED ARTICLE | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not include a discussion of the background or introduction. | The submission does not accurately address a discussion of the background or introduction of the research-based article. | The submission accurately addresses a discussion of the background or introduction of the research-based article. |
B2: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not include a description of the research methodology. | The submission includes a description but inaccurately describes the research methodology. | The submission includes a description that accurately describes the research methodology. |
B3: LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN THE RESEARCH-BASED ARTICLE | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not identify a level of evidence for the research-based article. | The submission identifies a level of evidence that is not accurate according to the JHNEBP model. | The submission accurately identifies a level of evidence that is based on the JHNEBP model. |
B4: ANALYSIS OF THE DATA | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not include a summary of data analysis. | The submission includes a summary of data analysis, but the summary does not accurately describe how the researcher analyzed the data in the article. | The submission includes a summary that accurately describes how the researcher analyzed the data in the article. |
B5: ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not include a summary of ethical considerations. Or, the submission does not include an explanation of why no ethical considerations are present if the research-based article contains none. | The submission includes a summary of ethical considerations, but the summary does not logically describe the ethical consideration(s) of the research-based article. Or, if no ethical considerations are present in the research-based article, the submission does not logically explain why none are present. | The submission includes a summary that logically describes the ethical consideration(s) of the research-based article. Or, if no ethical considerations are present, the submission includes a logical explanation of why none are present. |
B6: QUALITY RATING OF THE RESEARCH-BASED ARTICLE | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not identify a quality rating of the research-based article. | The submission identifies a quality rating that is not accurate according to the JHNEBP model. | The submission accurately identifies a quality rating according to the JHNEBP model. |
B7: RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS OF THE RESEARCH-BASED ARTICLE | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not include an analysis of the results or conclusions of the research-based article. | The submission includes an analysis of the results or conclusions, but the analysis does not logically evaluate the results or conclusions of the research-based article. Or the analysis does not appropriately explain how the results or conclusions helps answer the EBP question. | The submission includes an analysis that logically evaluates the results or conclusions of the research-based article and appropriately explains how the results or conclusions helps answer the EBP question. |
C: SELECTION OF A NON-RESEARCH-BASED ARTICLE | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
An article selection is not provided. | The selected article is not a non-research article or does not answer the EBP question from part A2. | The selected article is a non-research article and answers the EBP question from part A2. |
C1: BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION OF THE NON-RESEARCH ARTICLE | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not include a discussion of the background or introduction. | The submission includes a discussion that does not accurately address the background or introduction of the non-research-based article. | The submission includes a discussion that accurately addresses the background or introduction of the non-research-based article. |
C2: TYPE OF EVIDENCE | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not include a description of a type of evidence. | The submission includes a description of a type of evidence, but the description does not accurately describe the type of evidence used in the article. | The submission includes a description that accurately describes the type of evidence used in the article. |
C3: LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN THE NON-RESEARCH ARTICLE | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not identify a level of evidence for the non-research-based article. | The submission identifies a level of evidence that is not accurate according to the JHNEBP model. | The submission accurately identifies the level of evidence according to the JHNEBP model. |
C4: QUALITY RATING OF THE NON-RESEARCH ARTICLE | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not identify a quality rating for the non-research-based article. | The submission identifies a quality rating that is not accurate according to the JHNEBP model. | The submission accurately identifies the quality rating according to the JHNEBP model. |
C5: AUTHOR’S RECOMMENDATION | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not include a discussion of the author’s recommendation(s) that helped answer the EBP question. | The submission includes a discussion, but the discussion does not logically explain how the author’s recommendation(s) helped answer the EBP question. | The submission includes a discussion that logically explains how the author’s recommendation(s) helped answer the EBP question. |
D:RECOMMENDED PRACTICE CHANGE | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not identify 1 outcome for measuring the recommended practice change. | The submission identifies 1 outcome from the EBP question, but the outcome does not appropriately measure the recommended practice change. | The submission identifies 1 outcome from the EBP question that appropriately measures the recommended practice change. |
E:APA SOURCES | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
The submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. | The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style. | The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style. |
F:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION | ||
NOT EVIDENT | APPROACHING COMPETENCE | COMPETENT |
Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic. | Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective. | Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding. |
Abertpoelm says:
війна в україні 2022 пророцтва скільки ще буде тривати війна в україні скільки ще буде тривати війна в україні
Abrtpoelm says:
Бетмен фільм Бетмен онлайн The Batman
Abrtpoelm says:
http://bitly.com/legenda-destan-vse-serii
Abrtpoelm says:
http://bit.ly/legenda-destan-vse-serii
Abrtpoelm says:
https://bitbin.it/xUNGaaQL/
Abrtpoelm says:
https://bitbin.it/M6s1z3Ei/
Abrtpoelm says:
https://t.me/holostyaktntofficial2022
Abrtpoelm says:
Хранитель времени
Abrtpoelm says:
12 лет рабства
Abrtpoelm says:
Гарри Поттер и Дары Смерти
Abrtpoelm says:
Выживший
Abrtpoelm says:
На пятьдесят оттенков темнее
Abrtpoelm says:
Главный герой
Abrtpoelm says:
Гонка
Abrtpoelm says:
Охотник на лис
Abrtpoelm says:
Во все тяжкиеё
Abrtpoelm says:
Аквамен
Abrtpoelm says:
Отрочество
Abrtpoelm says:
Гравитация
Abrtpoelm says:
Вечер с Владимиром Соловьевым
Abrtpoelm says:
Игра в имитацию
Abrtpoelm says:
Последний богатырь 2
Abrtpoelm says:
Безумный Макс
Abrtpoelm says:
Рассказ Служанки
Abrtpoelm says:
Скажене Весiлля 2
Travisfliva says:
viagra without a doctor prescription canada best place to buy viagra online forum is there anything over the counter that works like viagra?
Artrunusa says:
cialis pills pictures cialis for free buy some cialis
Strokepay says:
ivermectin liquid for horses how can i get ivermectin ivermectin uk buy
Cortezgen says:
price of ivermectin tablets ivermectin studies 2021 ivermectin hiv
Edwardgof says:
cialis 10mg vs 20mg cialis manufacturer coupon cialis gernic
Edwardgof says:
cialis egypt generic medications cialis buy generic cialis with paypal
FrankEvons says:
where to buy amoxicillin amoxicillin 500mg buy online uk order amoxicillin 500mg
FrankEvons says:
amoxicillin 875 mg tablet amoxicillin medicine price for amoxicillin 875 mg
FrankEvons says:
prednisone 2 5 mg prednisone 5084 prednisone 30
FrankEvons says:
buy prednisone online india how to get prednisone tablets prednisone otc price
FrankEvons says:
clomid pills online india where can i buy clomid online safely purchase clomid online
FrankEvons says:
amoxicillin for sale online where to buy amoxicillin 500mg how to get amoxicillin over the counter
FrankEvons says:
price doxycycline doxycycline antibiotics doxycycline 100g
HaroldSof says:
erectile dysfunction drugs online ed pills cheap drugs
HaroldSof says:
prescription drugs online without doctor best male ed pills best ed treatments
HaroldSof says:
best pills for ed treatment with drugs best ed treatment pills
HaroldSof says:
buy prescription drugs online male erection pills buy prescription drugs without doctor
HaroldSof says:
best pills for ed drugs that cause ed medication for ed
StacyIdeop says:
what\’s works better viagra or cialis? purchase cialis with paypal cialis 5mg how long does it take to work
StacyIdeop says:
ivermectin insecticide ivermectin poisoning ivermectin dosage for dogs for heartworm prevention
StacyIdeop says:
medication for ed men ed buy prescription drugs online without
StacyIdeop says:
prednisone pharmacy can you buy prednisone over the counter prednisone 2.5 mg cost
StacyIdeop says:
medicines for ed pumps for ed soma therapy ed
CharlesDaw says:
ivermectin for alpacas ivermectin tapeworms
Williampet says:
cialis over the counter usa best price for daily cialis buy cialis online australia
Williampet says:
ivermectin horse paste tractor supply stromectol pills use of ivermectin
Williampet says:
buy prednisone without rx buy prednisone prednisone prices
Williampet says:
is it illegal to buy prescription drugs online erectile dysfunction medication online prescription for ed meds
Williampet says:
medicine for ed ed vacuum pump overcoming ed
Williampet says:
ivermectin 12 mg oral ivermectin for lice ivermectin pills for dogs
Williampet says:
when should you take cialis purchasing cialis in the usa cialis interactions
Charlessuelm says:
mens erection pills best ed drugs male ed drugs
Charlessuelm says:
ivermectin for foxes ivermectin dog ivermectin tablet
Charlessuelm says:
best erectile dysfunction pills cures for ed herbal ed treatment
Charlessuelm says:
ivermectin dosage for covid ivermectin horse paste tractor supply ivermectin 10 ml
Charlessuelm says:
cheap propecia online propecia 1mg generic buy propecia without prescription
Charlessuelm says:
merck propecia generic propecia cheap how do i get propecia
Charlessuelm says:
ivermectin drench where to buy ivermectin for guinea pigs ivermectin cream for scabies
Canadadrync says:
best online international pharmacies india overseas pharmacies online reputable online pharmacies in india
Canadadrync says:
buy stromectol online stromectol without a doctor prescription stromectol pills for humans
Canadadrync says:
buy prescription online from india trusted india online pharmacies cheap generic drugs from india
Michaelskeks says:
clomid buy clomid 50mg clomid tablets for sale
Michaelskeks says:
stromectol for sale stromectol 12 mg tablets stromectol pills for humans
Michaelskeks says:
buy clomid 50mg clomid for sale canada buy clomid 50mg
Michaelskeks says:
tadalafil 20 mg buy online tadalafil tablets 20 mg india cialis pills
Michaelskeks says:
clomid for sale clomid for sale buy clomid 50mg
Michaelskeks says:
sildenafil 100 mg lowest price sildenafil sildenafil
JamesTut says:
stromectol for sale ivermectin generic cream stromectol 12 mg tablets
JamesTut says:
ivermectin dose for scabies stromectol for humans for sale stromectol tablets for humans
JamesTut says:
stromectol tablets for humans stromectol for sale stromectol tablets for humans
Craigcliva says:
viagra from india pfizer viagra 100mg price best over the counter viagra
Craigcliva says:
viagra discount viagra viagra amazon
Craigcliva says:
п»їviagra pills viagra coupon viagra amazon
AndrewTOK says:
cialis for women dosage tadalafil 20mg generic cialis cipla
AndrewTOK says:
cialis 20 mg cost buy 10 mg cialis which is safer viagra or cialis
AndrewTOK says:
cialis and pay pal cialis pills cialisВ® online
AndrewTOK says:
cialis with out prescription generic cialis india cialis and viagra taken together
AndrewTOK says:
discount cialis 20mg buy tadalafil buy cialis 365 pills
AndrewTOK says:
cialis shop generic version of cialis cialis mit paypal bezahlen
Vaw says:
The Spruce Christopher Lee Foto When we took on this kitchen remodel, it was quite the plight. What you see today was not the original concept. Honestly, there were points during the renovation where I half expected Ty Pennington to show up and start narrating. However, the finished space is worth every sleepless night and squabble over whether to paint the kitchen cabinets or installing new countertops. I like the columns but my first thought was that they really don’t match the sleeker more modern look of the new island. I would have said yes on your blue more farmhouse style island for sure. The added seating with the chair you already have pushes me over the top to suggest to leave the columns out. Love the island makeover transformation. First, a custom-built kitchen island provides homeowners with the ability to tailor the design to their space. TriFection designs islands with a clear understanding of our clients’ objectives. For example, we know the desired package of appliances & fixtures and how they intend to use the space. We make sure to leave comfortable walking clearances on each side of the island. And, we’re aware of the type of chairs to be used for seating. As a result, the island can function well as a workspace for food prep, dining, homework, or just hanging out. https://chancedvka086431.popup-blog.com/12839604/joanna-gaines-remodeled-kitchens “Great experience from start to finish. Kenzig worked hard through three insurance inspections that ended up successfully winning the claim, and Rich kept in touch for the project. These guys were always on time for all scheduled meetings and were always available to answer all questions. I find that rare and was impressed with how SmartRoof- Roofing and Solar runs its business. Thanks for the positive experience to everyone,” their client said. The roofing company also provides its customers with a free estimate quotation for their roof or solar assessment by filling out the form on their website. I shouldn’t generalize, because of course many new homes are well-built! But there are definitely cases out there where a lot of tracts went up in a hurry, with a 10 year home warranty, and that’s how they were built – to last 10 years.
rhind says:
If you want to start playing for real but risk-free at a new online casino, 50 free spins may be the best promotion for you in 2022. This bonus gives new Canadian players free spins to use on popular online slots without deposit. Below, you can find everything you need to know about the 50 free spins no deposit bonus. 50 NO DEPOSIT FREE SPINSUp To $1000 + 125 Free Spins Comix Casino April Exclusive Joining FREE Spins Packs Casoo casino gives up to 200 free spins and $3000 in bonuses with your first 4 deposits. Sign up a free account and make a first deposit to get 100% bonus up to $450 + 100 free spins on a game of your choice, with your second deposit you get 50% bonus up to $450 and 100 free spins on a game of your choice, with your third deposit you get 40% bonus up to $600 and with your fourth deposit you get 25% bonus up to $1500 https://aussieqs.com.au/community/profile/margaretgargett/ We have tested all aspects of Paf Casino and our conclusion is that is is a very trustworthy casino. It is a good place to make your bets regardless of which game you prefer. Taking into account the amount of complaints, origin of licence, products and the quality of customer support we have found the casino to be a safe and a convinient place to gamble. Read on and learn more about Paf casino. Click here to play Many players are enticed by the casino’s special offers when they sign up. The most popular casinos offer a sign-up or deposit bonus, but Paf works a little bit differently. This Paf review Canada found that the casino changes its special offers regularly, and it provides new missions daily. This is different to the bonus found in our WinTrillion review where you get a deposit match bonus and extra slot spins.