Are Leaders Born Or Made
It is not very easy to describe the definition of leadership, but there are certain traits that one can tell of good leaders. All good leaders encourage a vision amid their supporters and establish a course to follow for completion that they suppose. Leaders’ primary skill is causing people around them to strive hard, not because they are expected to, but because they choose to. The definition of a leader is often related to an energetic and inspirational or one who sets pleasant assignments, though challenging. Motivation is a crucial experience required to be a good leader, inspiring as well as assuring others to work hard as though they are working for their leader (George 2006).
Leadership is a method or rather a process whereby an individual sets goals that govern other team members to enable them to achieve their objectives.
There are several known styles of leadership, namely; autocratic, bureaucratic, transformational and democratic
Transformational leadership is frequently referred to as the closest model to what is termed as ‘traditional.’ leadership. This ideal expresses better compared to a real leader as they have the following characteristics, transformational leadership creates an inspiring vision for the future, whereby vision creation is vital as it performs as a finished objective to direct and inspire the team members. This gives way to all schedules of the team members and can as well act as a topic of orientation following the completion of that assignment.
Influential autocratic leaders make rules and regulations and implement them without involving the public opinions and then command their followers to implement them for instance Adolf Hitler of Germany.
Consultative leaders seek public ideas and involve them in planning and implementing the ideas that are most important to the public.
Democratic or participative leaders take part just as their followers and allow the members to make decisions, for example President John F. Kennedy of the United States is one among the best leaders in the world.
The laisser-faire leaders allow the public or rather the members to take measures and make decisions on their own. For instance, motivated and steered by Renis Likert, a research team at the University of Michigan learned leadership for some years and acknowledged two different leadership styles, namely; job-centred and employee-centred. The job-centred leader monitors the subordinate while they execute their duties. This type of leader depends on gratification, penalty, and genuine power to impact members’ characters. The employee-centered leader trusts that generating an understanding work environment eventually is the way to higher organizational outcome. This leader demonstrates an abundant concern with the emotional well-being, individual’s growth and development as well as the accomplishments of the team members. Bureaucratic is a leadership style whereby state officials make decisions.
As mentioned earlier, a leader is a person who is energetic and inspirational and also one who sets pleasant assignments, though challenging. With relation to this, there are several similarities, for instance, all leaders create the foundation of the organization and functional structure, they all are concerned with goal achievement, and they are concerned with resource allocation such that they can be utilized effectively and efficiently, among others.
Traits of a leader
There are several personality traits or personalities which can be used to assess the level of a leader. They include determination, assertiveness, intelligence, empathy, skill and quality, among others.
Importance of leadership
Good leadership is often cited as a critical reason for organizational success. A leader who inspires their workforce to perform at the highest level consistently is likely to see success resonate throughout the organization. Powerful leadership, too, can produce additional leaders. This can be somewhat effective as it signifies innovative leaders are generated within rather than recruiting externally. It also warrants that leaders are created those that comprehend the values and strategies internally. Excellent leadership also imparts a culture in the company where every person is ready to work actively for their colleagues. This resonates entirely through the whole organization and is an excellent way of guaranteeing excellent performance maintenance.
Regardless of one’s organization’s expertise, model, or assets, without effective leadership, execution can stay low. Effective leadership joins these determinants jointly to generate a high-performance organization. An organization can theoretically have the probability of success; however, only leadership can put this probability into action and pass on real results. Leaders can be especially significant in times of alterations or frail performance. In this case, leaders have the expertise to enhance urge and assurance plus lead the organization through troubled times.
Lessons learned related to leadership.
Several people believe that good leaders are born with those characteristics and that the expertise they have cannot be trained to others. This is untrue because learning about theories as well as models, face-to-face teaching, and skill can be combined to give a strong leader, irrespective of their natural abilities. Even the most significant leaders are continually learning and are likely to have learned most of their leadership skills from someone else. The important thing is never to believe one has learned all there is to grasp and keep strengthening experiences as well as finding out from different encounters. For instance, there are several known leaders both made and those with inborn leadership traits, that is, Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Quaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah, Martin Luther King. These leaders have seen themselves through to leadership through their dedication to work, determination, integrity, as well as hard work.
In conclusion, the creation of this set of skills and becoming an effective leader can make one of high strength to any organization and is likely to see them financially gratified for the expertise one develops. There is no ‘one size fits all’ style of leadership. Also, there are no similar leaders in the making. Therefore, as one develops their leadership technique, one should not worry that it is not directly from the books, or instead, it is not necessarily learned from the classroom. Leadership models and styles are just strategies for how one should contemplate about developing their leadership skill-set (Van der Meij, Schaveling & van Vugt 2016).
Koch, J., D’Mello, D. & Sackett, R. (2015). A Meta-Analysis of Gender Stereotypes and Bias in Experimental Simulations of Employment Decision Making. Journal of Applied Psychology. 100 (1): 128–161. Doi: 10.1037/a0036734
Van der Meij, L., Schaveling, J., & van Vugt, M. (2016). Basal testosterone, leadership and dominance: A field study and meta-analysis. Psych neuroendocrinology. 72: 72-79.
George, M. (2006). Leader Positive Mood and Group Performance: The Case of Customer Service. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25(9):778–794