Categories
Uncategorized

2. What security and ethical issues do you have with technology?

BCO 216 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS Mid – Term Task brief & rubrics Task • You are required answer the questions attached below • This is an individual task • Please ensure your address all the points are covered in your responses • Format to be submitted: A word document • Include a Cover, Table of Contents, References Formalities: Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded of the total wordcount. Font: Arial 12,5 pts.

Text alignment: Justified. The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style Submission: Week 2– Via Moodle (Turnitin). 15 November 23:59 CEST Weight: This task is 40% of your total grade for this subject.

QUESTIONS: Question 1 (25 Points) 1. Define and explain the following: A) Data B) Big Data C) Information D) Knowledge E) Business Intelligence Question 2 (25 Points) 2. What security and ethical issues do you have with technology? Question 3 (25 points) 3. Identify the different departments in a company and why they must work together to achieve success.

Question 4 (25 points) 4. Define, explain Customer Relationship Management Systems (CRM) and the benefits of CRM Rubrics Exceptional 90-100 Good 80-89 Fair 70-79 Marginal fail 60-69 Fail <60 Knowledge (30%) Student correctly defines and describes the topics of each at all levels demonstrating a full understanding of the essay theme. Student defines and describes the topics of each key stage, demonstrating a good understanding of the essay theme (may lack a key aspect). Student makes a fair attempt at defining and describing the topics however details regarding the business in question are missing.

Student makes an attempt at defining and describing the topics, however important details regarding analysis of the business in question are missing Student fails to correctly define or describe the key elements of the business in question, demonstrating a lack of understanding of the topic. Critical evaluation (30%) There is very good evidence of critical appraisal of ideas and concepts, the insights are outstanding. Evidence of critical appraisal of ideas and evaluation is good. There is some evidence of critical appraisal of ideas and concepts, but the analysis and insights are rudimentary for this level of study.

There is limited evidence of critical appraisal of ideas and concepts and/or those that are offered are weak There is no critical appraisal of ideas and concepts and/or those that are offered are weak Application (30%) Applies knowledge and skills in familiar contexts with a high degree of effectiveness, providing relevant examples that support points. Applies knowledge and skills in familiar contexts with considerable effectiveness, providing some relevant examples that make a good attempt at supporting points. Applies knowledge and skills in familiar contexts with limited effectiveness, few/ irrelevant examples provided. Applies knowledge, but does so incorrectly with very weak examples.

No application of knowledge. No examples are provided. Communication (10%) Uses conventions, vocabulary, and terminology of the discipline with a high effectiveness. Uses conventions, vocabulary, and terminology of the discipline with considerable effectiveness. Uses conventions, vocabulary, and terminology of the discipline with some effectiveness. Uses conventions, vocabulary, and terminology of the discipline with limited effectiveness. Work is poorly written and/or difficult to understand.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *